2017 General Teacher Preparation Policy
The state should require teacher preparation programs to admit only candidates with strong academic records and support programs to encourage greater numbers of qualified individuals of color to become teachers. The bar for this goal was raised in 2017.
GPA/Testing Requirement: Idaho does not ensure that teacher preparation programs admit only candidates with strong academic backgrounds. The state does not require a minimum GPA for admission to teacher preparation programs.
Idaho does not require aspiring teachers to pass a test of academic proficiency at the time of admission. The state requires that candidates to pass a content area assessment and pedagogy assessment prior to student teaching.
Additional Requirements: Idaho requires all teacher preparation programs to obtain CAEP accreditation. Unfortunately, CAEP standards were weakened by the decision to allow programs to delay verifying their students' academic ability until graduation, rather than at the time of admission.
Diversity Programs: Idaho is not implementing any programs designed to increase the diversity of its teacher candidates.
IDAPA 08.02.02.100 https://adminrules.idaho.gov/rules/current/08/0202.pdf CAEP/Idaho Partnership Agreement http://www.caepnet.org/working-together/state-partners/state-partnership-agreements
Require that teacher preparation programs screen candidates for academic proficiency prior to admission.
Teacher preparation programs that do not screen candidates invest considerable resources in individuals who may not be able to successfully complete the program, pass licensing tests, and ultimately succeed in the classroom. Candidates in need of additional support should complete remediation before entering the program to avoid the possibility of an unsuccessful investment of significant public resources. Idaho should require candidates to pass a test of academic proficiency that assesses reading, mathematics, and writing prior to program admission that is normed to the general college-going population.Alternatively, the state could require a minimum grade point average of at least 3.0 for individuals or 3.2 for cohorts of accepted candidates in order to establish that prospective teachers have a strong academic history. The state should create its own requirements, rather than using CAEP standards, as CAEP no longer requires that candidates demonstrate academic proficiency at the time of admission; rather, candidates can delay this until program exit.
Support programs that encourage greater numbers of qualified individuals of color to enter and successfully complete teacher preparation programs.
Above and beyond what CAEP requires, Idaho should support specific strategies—such as scholarships, mentorships, "grow your own" and academic support programs—that aim to increase teacher diversity in a manner that does not diminish teacher licensure, certification, and entry requirements. Intentionally recruiting a diverse pool of candidates into teacher preparation programs can benefit both programs and the students that these candidates will eventually teach.
Consider requiring candidates to pass subject-matter tests as a condition of admission into teacher programs.
Rather than requiring subject matter testing at the point of certification, Idaho may also consider requiring subject matter testing prior to program admission, rather than at the point of program completion. Doing so would provide candidates lacking sufficient subject-matter expertise with an opportunity to remedy deficits prior to entering formal preparation.
Idaho provided NCTQ with facts that enhanced this analysis.
The state also provided that NCTQ's statement of "Unfortunately, CAEP standards were weakened by the decision to allow programs to delay verifying their students' academic ability until graduation, rather than at the time of admission" is not based on evidence because it is up to CAEP to judge whether the educator preparation program is weakened. Idaho further added that since Idaho requires CAEP accreditation, including meeting CAEP Standards 3: Candidate Quality, Recruitment, and Selectivity, the preparation programs are required to have standards for admission. So even though there is no "specific" Idaho state rule that explicitly requires a minimum GPA or basic skills assessment for entrance into a preparation program, the fact that Idaho requires CAEP accreditation embeds the idea of candidate quality and selectivity.
Idaho also noted that even though the state does not have any statute or rule requiring aspiring teachers to pass a test of academic proficiency or have a certain GPA as a criterion for admission to teacher preparation programs, five of the seven Idaho institutions require a minimum GPA and four of the seven Idaho institutions require a minimum basic skills test score.
CAEP no longer requires candidates to meet particular academic proficiency criteria at the point of admission, rather, it allows candidates to delay meeting these requirements until later in the program. As a result, NCTQ believes CAEP standards regarding candidate quality and selection are weakened, and that meeting those standards alone does not constitute sufficient selectivity.
1A: Program Entry
Evidence is strong that countries whose students consistently outperform U.S. students set a much higher bar for entry to teacher preparation programs than what is typically found in the United States. Far from the top third or even top tenth to which more selective countries limit candidates, most states do not even aim for the top 50 percent. Previous analysis has shown that many states do not require that preparation programs evaluate candidates' academic proficiency as a condition of admission to teacher preparation at all; most others set a low bar by requiring basic skills tests that generally assess middle school-level skills or by requiring a minimum GPA, but too few demand at least a 3.0.
In addition to the low skill level tested by current basic skills tests (e.g., the Praxis Core), another concern is that they are normed only to the prospective teacher population, which does not allow for comparability between prospective teachers and the entire college-bound population. Tests normed to the general college-bound population would shine a clearer light on the academic proficiency of those admitted to teacher preparation programs and allow programs to be truly selective.
While a positive start, CAEP standards are no substitute for states' own policies. CAEP's standards require that the group average performance on nationally normed ability assessments such as ACT, SAT, or GRE be in the top 50th percentile. However, CAEP allows programs the unnecessary freedom to determine whether the minimum criteria will be measured prior to admissions or at some point during the program. Clear state admission policies would send an unequivocal message to programs about the state's expectations for high admissions standards.
Research is clear about the positive effects of teachers with stronger academic backgrounds on student achievement. Higher teacher selectivity, as measured by factors such as SAT/ACT scores, GPA prior to program admission, and an institute of higher education's (IHE) general competitiveness or selectivity, has a significant, positive correlation with student achievement. Some studies support higher academic admissions standards for entry into TPPs, including studies showing a relationship between student achievement and teachers' verbal ability or selectivity of the teachers' college. Although research supports applying greater selectivity when admitting teacher candidates, some recent work has found no correlation between teachers' scores on tests normed to the general college-bound population (e.g., SAT, ACT) or IHE selectivity and student achievement.
States should support increased diversity in the teacher pipeline, in addition to maintaining high admissions standards for teacher preparation programs. Recent data show that 49 percent of students in the US were students of color, while only 17 percent of teachers were teachers of color. Twenty-eight states had gaps between the percentage of students and educators of color that were greater than 25 percentage points. A growing body of research suggests that students of color—students who often face the largest achievement gaps—benefit from having same-race teachers. Exposure to same-race teachers positively benefits student achievement, teachers' expectations and perceptions of students, teachers' assessments and perceptions of student behavior, students' rates of suspension and expulsion, students' assignment to Gifted and Talented programs, and students' perceptions of teachers. Some research suggests that teachers of the same race as their students are more likely to reduce high-school dropout rates as well as increase student attendance and college attendance intent, and improve discipline. Moreover, white students report that they favor teachers of color.