The state should base licensure advancement on evidence of teacher effectiveness. This goal was consistent between 2015 and 2017.
Evidence of Effectiveness: Idaho articulates some requirements for teacher licensing that are based on
evidence of teacher effectiveness.
Advancing to a Professional License: Idaho requires teachers to show "measurable student achievement," the majority of which must be based on student growth, as measured by assessments and/or student learning objectives, to advance from a residency certificate (valid for three years) to a professional certificate (renewable every five years).
Renewing a Professional License: Idaho requires teachers to meet applicable credit requirements of their specific endorsements to renew the professional license. Completion of the Idaho Comprehensive Literacy Course is a one-time renewal requirement for anyone who holds a Standard Elementary or Standard Exceptional Child Certificate, regardless of their employment status at the time of renewal. The Mathematical Thinking for Instruction course is also a requirement for applicable teachers.
Idaho Administrative Code 08.02.02.015
Require evidence of effectiveness as a part of teacher licensing policy.
Idaho should require evidence of teacher effectiveness to be a factor in determining whether teachers may renew their licenses.
Discontinue licensure requirements with no direct connection to classroom effectiveness.
Although some targeted requirements—such as Idaho's requirement for study of reading instruction— may potentially expand teacher knowledge and improve teacher practice, Idaho's other general, nonspecific coursework requirements for license renewal merely call for teachers to complete a certain amount of seat time. These requirements do not correlate with teacher effectiveness.
Idaho recognized the factual accuracy of this analysis.
9A: Licensure Advancement
The reason for probationary licensure should be to determine teacher effectiveness. Most states grant new teachers a probationary license that must later be converted to an advanced or professional license. A probationary period is sound policy as it provides an opportunity to determine whether individuals merit professional licensure. However, very few states require any determination of teacher performance or effectiveness in deciding whether a teacher will advance from the probationary license. Instead, states generally require probationary teachers to fulfill a set of requirements to receive advanced certification. Therefore, ending the probationary period is based on whether a checklist has been completed rather than on teacher performance and effectiveness.
Most state requirements for achieving professional certification have not been shown to affect teacher effectiveness. Unfortunately, not only do most states fail to connect advanced certification to actual evidence of teacher effectiveness, but also the requirements teachers must most often meet are not even related to teacher effectiveness. The most common requirement for professional licensure is completion of additional coursework, often resulting in a master's degree. Requiring teachers to obtain additional training in their teaching area would be meaningful; however, the requirements are usually vague, allowing the teacher to fulfill coursework requirements from long menus that include areas having no connection or use to the teacher in the classroom. The research evidence on requiring a master's degree is quite conclusive: with rare exceptions, these degrees have not been shown to make teachers more effective. This is likely due in no small part to the fact that teachers may not attain master's degrees in their subject areas.
In addition to their dubious value, these requirements may also serve as a disincentive to teacher retention. Talented probationary teachers may be unwilling to invest time and resources in more education coursework. Further, they may well pursue advanced degrees that facilitate leaving teaching.