2017 Retaining Effective Teachers Policy
The state should base licensure advancement on evidence of teacher effectiveness. This goal was consistent between 2015 and 2017.
Evidence of effectiveness: The District of Columbia explicitly allows for the consideration of evidence of effectiveness in licensure advancement and renewal; however, evidence of teacher effectiveness is not required.
Advancing to a professional license: The District of Columbia requires that its teachers, to advance from the initial to the standard credential, complete an approve preparation program in the applicable teaching subject area/grade level and pass all basic skills and content tests. Teachers who do not complete a program in the applicable teaching subject area/grade level may present documentation of two years of teaching experience (within the previous three years) achieving an effective or equivalent rating on a summative evaluation.
Renewing a professional license: The District of Columbia outlines two options to renew the standard license. Option A is a performance-based renewal that allows teachers to present documentation verifying achievement of a summative evaluation of effective for a minimum of three years during the four-year term of validity. Option B allows teacher to renew by completing 90 hours or six college credits of professional development.
Educator Credential Requirements Overview https://osse.dc.gov/page/educator-credential-requirements-overview#teacherstandard Renewal Requirements https://osse.dc.gov/page/educator-credential-renewal-requirements
Require evidence of effectiveness as a part
of teacher licensing policy.
The District of Columbia should require evidence of teacher effectiveness to be a factor in determining whether teachers may renew or advance to a higher-level license.
Discontinue license requirements with no direct connection to classroom effectiveness.
Although targeted requirements may potentially expand teacher knowledge and improve teacher practice, the District of Columbia's general, nonspecific coursework requirements for license renewal merely call for teachers to complete a certain amount of seat time. These requirements do not correlate with teacher effectiveness.
The District of Columbia asserted that it requires evidence of
effectiveness for the issuance of initial, standard, and renewals of a teacher
credential via submission of effective performance evaluations completed by the
hiring local school districts.
To advance from an initial to a full standard credential, the District requires its teachers to complete an approved educator preparation program in the applicable teaching subject area/grade level, pass Praxis I Core series basic skills exams, Praxis II subject-area content knowledge, and Praxis II Principles of Learning and Teaching pedagogy exams. An additional pathway to credentialing allows teachers who do not complete a program to utilize effective performance evaluations conducted by the employing district. Teachers may submit an application with documentation of two years of consecutive effective teaching experience in a teaching subject area/grade level that corresponds with their teaching assignment and passing scores on Praxis I Core series basic skills exams, Praxis II subject-area content knowledge, and Praxis II Principles of Learning and Teaching pedagogy exams.
The District reiterated its two options to renew the standard license. Option A is a performance-based renewal that allows teachers to present documentation verifying achievement of effective teaching for three yearly summative evaluation periods directly in the credential subject area during the four-year term of validity. Option B allows teachers to renew by completing 90 professional learning unit/clock hours or six college credits of professional development.
9A: Licensure Advancement
The reason for probationary licensure should be to determine teacher effectiveness. Most states grant new teachers a probationary license that must later be converted to an advanced or professional license. A probationary period is sound policy as it provides an opportunity to determine whether individuals merit professional licensure. However, very few states require any determination of teacher performance or effectiveness in deciding whether a teacher will advance from the probationary license. Instead, states generally require probationary teachers to fulfill a set of requirements to receive advanced certification. Therefore, ending the probationary period is based on whether a checklist has been completed rather than on teacher performance and effectiveness.
Most state requirements for achieving professional certification have not been shown to affect teacher effectiveness. Unfortunately, not only do most states fail to connect advanced certification to actual evidence of teacher effectiveness, but also the requirements teachers must most often meet are not even related to teacher effectiveness. The most common requirement for professional licensure is completion of additional coursework, often resulting in a master's degree. Requiring teachers to obtain additional training in their teaching area would be meaningful; however, the requirements are usually vague, allowing the teacher to fulfill coursework requirements from long menus that include areas having no connection or use to the teacher in the classroom. The research evidence on requiring a master's degree is quite conclusive: with rare exceptions, these degrees have not been shown to make teachers more effective. This is likely due in no small part to the fact that teachers may not attain master's degrees in their subject areas.
In addition to their dubious value, these requirements may also serve as a disincentive to teacher retention. Talented probationary teachers may be unwilling to invest time and resources in more education coursework. Further, they may well pursue advanced degrees that facilitate leaving teaching.