The state should require teacher preparation programs to admit only candidates with strong academic records and support programs to encourage greater numbers of qualified individuals of color to become teachers. This goal was ungraded in 2020.
GPA/Testing Requirement: West Virginia requires a cohort average GPA of 3.0 in the core subjects. Individual candidates must obtain a GPA of 2.5 for admission.
West Virginia requires preparation programs to ensure that their cohort mean score on nationally normed tests of academic proficiency such as the ACT, SAT or GRE, is in the top 50th percentile. The state also allows candidates to meet this requirement with the Praxis CORE test which is not a nationally normed test.
Additional Requirements: West Virginia requires all teacher preparation programs housed in institutions of higher education to obtain CAEP accreditation. Although meeting CAEP accreditation standards ensures a certain degree of proficiency, CAEP delays verification of student's academic ability until graduation, rather than at the time of admissions.
Diversity Programs: West Virginia is not implementing any programs designed to increase the diversity of its teacher candidates.
Require that teacher preparation programs screen candidates for academic proficiency prior to admission using rigorous criteria.
Teacher preparation programs that do not screen candidates invest considerable resources in individuals who may not be able to successfully complete the program, pass licensing tests, and ultimately succeed in the classroom. Candidates in need of additional support should complete remediation before entering the program to avoid the possibility of an unsuccessful investment of significant public resources. West Virginia should require all candidates to pass a test of academic proficiency that assesses reading, mathematics, and writing and that is normed to the general college-going population prior to program admission. Alternatively, the state could require a minimum grade point average of at least 3.0 for individuals or 3.2 for cohorts of accepted candidates in order to establish that prospective teachers have a strong academic history.
Support programs that encourage greater numbers of qualified individuals of color to enter and successfully complete teacher preparation programs.
West Virginia should support strategies — such as scholarships, mentorships, "grow your own" and academic support programs — that aim to increase teacher diversity in a manner that does not diminish teacher licensure, certification, and entry requirements. Intentionally recruiting a diverse pool of candidates into teacher preparation programs can benefit both programs and the students that these candidates will eventually teach.
Consider requiring candidates to pass subject-matter tests as a condition of admission into teacher programs.
In addition to ensuring that programs require a measure of academic performance for admission, West Virginia may also consider requiring subject-matter testing prior to program admission, rather than at the point of program completion. Doing so would provide candidates lacking sufficient subject-matter expertise with an opportunity to remedy deficits prior to entering formal preparation.
West Virginia indicated that in the 2018 CAEP handbook, it is stated that under components 3.3 and 3.4 data demonstrates that the quality of initial program candidates is a continuing and purposeful part of the EPPs 'responsibility. "The EPP describes its decision about when it measures the CAEP average criteria (i.e., at admissions or some other time before candidate completion), then disaggregates results on the CAEP minima (GPA and test performance) by admission year.
• The EPP presents results separately for mathematics, reading, and (beginning in 2021) writing.
• The EPP can use a variety of normed tests to demonstrate that candidates' average at or above the 50th percentile.
The EPP includes evidence that it continuously monitors disaggregated results on the CAEP minima (GPA and test performance) by branch campuses, by mode of delivery (e.g., online programs) if applicable, and by licensure program. The site team verifies that the CAEP minima are met in each academic year. The site team verifies the EPPs monitoring and conclusions about findings of candidate quality for individual preparation programs, branch campuses and/or online programs (if applicable)."
West Virginia also noted that its definition of diversity is not strictly focused on race. According to the state, the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy estimates that 336,300 West Virginians lived in poverty in 2017 placing the state poverty rate at 19.1 percent which is 5.7 percentage points higher than the national average. The state is implementing programs that focus on those students who fall within the poverty range and who meet struggles in making advancements out of the poverty cycle.
Alternative routes to teaching for those who fall in the low SES group:
Evidence is strong that countries whose students consistently outperform U.S. students set a much higher bar for entry to teacher preparation programs than what is typically found in the United States. Far from the top third or even top tenth to which more selective countries limit candidates, most states do not even aim for the top 50 percent. Previous analysis has shown that many states do not require that preparation programs evaluate candidates' academic proficiency as a condition of admission to teacher preparation at all; most others set a low bar by requiring basic skills tests that generally assess middle school-level skills or by requiring a minimum GPA, but too few demand at least a 3.0.
In addition to the low skill level tested by current basic skills tests (e.g., the Praxis Core), another concern is that they are normed only to the prospective teacher population, which does not allow for comparability between prospective teachers and the entire college-bound population. Tests normed to the general college-bound population would shine a clearer light on the academic proficiency of those admitted to teacher preparation programs and allow programs to be truly selective.
While a positive start, CAEP standards are no substitute for states' own policies. CAEP's standards require that the group average performance on nationally normed ability assessments such as ACT, SAT, or GRE be in the top 50th percentile. However, CAEP allows programs the unnecessary freedom to determine whether the minimum criteria will be measured prior to admissions or at some point during the program. Clear state admission policies would send an unequivocal message to programs about the state's expectations for high admissions standards.
Research is clear about the positive effects of teachers with stronger academic backgrounds on student achievement. Higher teacher selectivity, as measured by factors such as SAT/ACT scores, GPA prior to program admission, and an institute of higher education's (IHE) general competitiveness or selectivity, has a significant, positive correlation with student achievement. Some studies support higher academic admissions standards for entry into TPPs, including studies showing a relationship between student achievement and teachers' verbal ability or selectivity of the teachers' college. Although research supports applying greater selectivity when admitting teacher candidates, some recent work has found no correlation between teachers' scores on tests normed to the general college-bound population (e.g., SAT, ACT) or IHE selectivity and student achievement.
States should support increased diversity in the teacher pipeline, in addition to maintaining high admissions standards for teacher preparation programs. Recent data show that 49 percent of students in the US were students of color, while only 17 percent of teachers were teachers of color. Twenty-eight states had gaps between the percentage of students and educators of color that were greater than 25 percentage points. A growing body of research suggests that students of color—students who often face the largest achievement gaps—benefit from having same-race teachers. Exposure to same-race teachers positively benefits student achievement, teachers' expectations and perceptions of students, teachers' assessments and perceptions of student behavior, students' rates of suspension and expulsion, students' assignment to Gifted and Talented programs, and students' perceptions of teachers. Some research suggests that teachers of the same race as their students are more likely to reduce high-school dropout rates as well as increase student attendance and college attendance intent, and improve discipline. Moreover, white students report that they favor teachers of color.