The state should ensure that pension systems are neutral, uniformly increasing pension wealth with each additional year of work.
Kansas's pension system is based on a benefit formula that is not neutral, meaning that each year of work does not accrue pension wealth in a uniform way until teachers reach conventional retirement age, such as that associated with Social Security.
Teachers' retirement wealth is determined by their monthly payments and the length of time they expect to receive those payments. Monthly payments are usually calculated as final average salary multiplied by years of service multiplied by a set multiplier (such as 1.5 percent). Higher salary, more years of service or a greater multiplier increases monthly payments and results in greater pension wealth. Earlier retirement eligibility with unreduced benefits also increases pension wealth, because more payments will be received.
To qualify as neutral, a pension formula must utilize a constant benefit multiplier and an eligibility timetable based solely on age, rather than years of service. Basing eligibility for retirement on years of service creates unnecessary and often unfair peaks in pension wealth, while allowing unreduced retirement at a young age creates incentives to retire early. Plans that change their multipliers for various years of service do not value each year of teaching equally. Therefore, plans with a constant multiplier and that base retirement on an age in line with Social Security are likely to create the most uniform accrual of wealth.
An employee's retirement benefit under Kansas' new cash balance plan is based on the balance of his or her annuity savings account. Periodically, a percentage of compensation is credited to each member's account. This credit is not constant and based on a member's number of service years. Thus, while Kansas used a constant annuity factor to determine the benefit amount under the old tier, this is no longer the case. In addition, teachers may retire before standard retirement age based on years of service without a reduction in benefits. Teachers with 30 years of service can retire at age 60, and teachers with five years of service can retire at age 65. Therefore, teachers who begin their careers by age 30 can reach 30 years of service by age 60, entitling them to five additional years of credits to their retirement accounts beyond what other teachers would receive who may not retire until age 65. Not only are teachers being paid benefits by the state well before Social Security's retirement age, but these provisions, along with the state's early retirement with reduced benefits based on years of service, may also encourage effective teachers to retire early, and they fail to treat equally those teachers who enter the system at a later age and give the same amount of service.
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System, Valuation Report as of December 31, 2015.
Utilize a constant benefit accrual factor to calculate retirement benefits for all teachers, regardless of years of service.
Each year of service should accrue equal pension wealth. Kansas should use a pension formula that treats each year of service equally.
End retirement eligibility based on years of service.
Kansas should change its practice of allowing teachers with 30 years of service to retire at any age with full benefits. If retirement at an earlier age is offered to some teachers, benefits should be reduced accordingly to compensate for the longer duration they will be awarded.
Align eligibility for retirement with unreduced benefits with Social Security retirement age.
Kansas allows teachers to retire before conventional retirement age. As life expectancies continue to increase, teachers may draw out of the system for many more years than they contributed. This is not compatible with a financially sustainable system (see pension sustainability goal).
Kansas did not respond to repeated requests to review this analysis.