The state should require that its school districts consider classroom performance as a factor in determining which teachers are laid off when a reduction in force is necessary. This was reorganized in 2021.
Factors to Consider: Hawaii determines which teachers are laid off
during reductions in force using a teacher's seniority. "Should a staff reduction be necessary, the teacher in the department with the least number of years of service in the State shall be reduced."
Agreement Between The Hawaii State Teachers Association And The State of Hawaii and Board of Education 2017-2021 https://www.hsta.org/portals/0/documents/HSTA-CBA-FINAL-2021.pdf
Ensure that seniority is not the only factor used to determine which teachers are laid off.
Although it may be useful for Hawaii to consider seniority among other criteria, the state should also consider performance so that it does not sacrifice effective teachers while maintaining low performers.
Hawaii recognized the factual accuracy of this analysis.
"Last In, First Out (LIFO)" policies put adult interests before student needs, yet most districts across the country still use these policies in the event of teacher layoffs. While most states leave these decisions to district discretion, other states require layoffs to be based on seniority. Such policies fail to give due weight to a teacher's classroom performance and risk sacrificing effective teachers while maintaining low performers.
Policies that prioritize seniority in layoff decisions can also cause significant upheaval in schools and school districts. As teachers who are newer to the classroom traditionally draw lower salaries, a seniority-based layoff policy is likely to require that districts lay off a larger number of probationary teachers rather than a smaller group of ineffective teachers to achieve the same budget reduction.
States can leave districts flexibility in determining layoff policies, but they should do so while also ensuring that classroom performance is considered. Further, if performance is prioritized, states need not prohibit the use of seniority as an additional criterion in determining who is laid off.