Alternate Route Usage and Providers: Delaware

2015 Expanding the Pool of Teachers Policy

Goal

The state should provide an alternate route that is free from limitations on its usage and allows a diversity of providers.

Meets

Analysis of Delaware's policies

Delaware's Alternate Route for Teacher Licensure and Certification (ARTC) is only available for candidates seeking certification in certain critical-needs secondary subjects and K-12 music and art. Candidates in the Delaware Transition to Teaching Partnership (DT3P) may only teach in grades 6-12 at a high-need school. The Masters Plus Certification Program (MPCP) is limited to special education certification. The Ninety-one Days in Lieu of Student Teaching option also has limits on subjects the candidate is allowed to teach.

Delaware also authorizes Teach For America (TFA) as an alternate route for all grade levels, subjects and geographic areas. Additionally, Relay's Master of Arts in Teaching (MAT) offers certification in all elementary grades and, for middle and secondary grades, English, math, science and social studies.

ARTC, DT3P and MPCP are partnerships between the Department of Education and the University of Delaware. 

Citation

Recommendations for Delaware

Broaden alternate route usage.

Delaware should reconsider grade-level and subject-area restrictions on the ARTC, MPCP and DT3P. Alternate routes should not be programs of last resort for hard-to-staff subjects, grade levels or geographic areas but rather a way to expand the teacher pipeline throughout the state.

State response to our analysis

Delaware noted that state policy does refer to CAEP standards for teacher preparation being upheld but does not explicitly require a program to be approved by CAEP.

Importantly, state policy provides an avenue for ARTC approval by virtue of RFP solicited from the Department of Education, the requirements of which can be defined by the Department (within restrictions of code). Proposals from nonuniversity providers are allowed.

How we graded

Research rationale

Alternate routes should be structured to do more than just address shortages; they should provide an alternative pipeline for talented individuals to enter the profession.
Many states have structured their alternate routes as a streamlined means to certify teachers in shortage subjects, grades or geographic areas. While alternate routes are an important mechanism for addressing shortages, they also serve the wider-reaching and more consequential purpose of providing an alternative pathway for talented individuals to enter the profession. A true alternate route creates a new pipeline of potential teachers by certifying those with valuable knowledge and skills who did not prepare to teach as undergraduates and are disinclined to fulfill the requirements of a new degree.

Some states claim that the limitations they place on the use of their alternate routes impose quality control. However, states control who is admitted and who is licensed. With appropriate standards for admission and program accountability, quality can be safeguarded without casting alternate routes as routes of last resort or branding alternate route teachers "second-class citizens."

Alternate Route Usage and Providers: Supporting Research
From a teacher quality perspective—and supporting NCTQ's contention for broad-based, respectable, and widely-offered programs—there exists substantial research demonstrating the need for states to adopt alternate certification programs. Independent research on candidates who earned certification through the alternate-route Teach For America (conducted by Kane, Parsons and Associates) and the American Board for Certification of Teacher Excellence (conducted by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. and ABCTE) programs has found that alternate route teachers are often as effective, and, in many cases, more effective, than traditionally-prepared teachers.  See also M. Raymond, S. Fletcher, and J. Luque, July 2001. Teach for America: An evaluation of teacher differences and student outcomes in Houston, Texas. Stanford, CA: The Hoover Institution, Center for Research on Education Outcomes.

Specifically, evidence of the effectiveness of candidates in respectable and selective alternate certification requirements can be found in J. Constantine, D. Player, T. Silva, K. Hallgren, M. Grider, J. Deke, and E. Warner, An Evaluation of Teachers Trained Through Different Routes to Certification: Final ReportFebruary 2009, U.S. Department of Education, NCEE 2009-4043; D. Boyd, P. Grossman, H. Lankford, S. Loeb, and J. Wyckoff, "How Changes in Entry Requirements Alter the Teacher Workforce and Affect Student Achievement." NBER Working Paper No. 11844, December 2005; T. Kane, J. Rockoff, and D. Staiger. "What Does Certification Tell Us About Teacher Effectiveness? Evidence from New York City." NBER Working Paper No.12155, April 2006.

A number of studies have also found alternative-certification programs such as Teach for America to produce teachers that were more effective at improving student achievement than other teachers with similar levels of experience.  See Z. Xu, J. Hannaway, and C. Taylor, "Making a Difference? The Effects of Teach for America in High School." The Urban Institute/CalderApril 2007, Working Paper 17; D. Boyd, P. Grossman, K. Hammerness, H. Lankford, S. Loeb, M. Ronfeldt, and J. Wyckoff, "Recruiting Effective Math Teachers: How Do Math Immersion Teachers Compare?: Evidence from New York City." NBER Working Paper 16017, May 2010. 

For evidence that alternate route programs offered by institutions of higher education are often virtually identical to traditional programs, see Alternative Certification Isn't Alternative (NCTQ, 2007) at:  http://www.nctq.org/p/publications/docs/Alternative_Certification_Isnt_Alternative_20071124023109.pdf.