The state should maintain requirements that make teaching licenses held by effective teachers fully portable across state lines, with appropriate safeguards. This goal has been revised since 2017.
Eligibility for Standard License: Alaska offers an initial certificate to out-of-state certified teachers.
Evidence of Effectiveness: Alaska does not require evidence of effective teaching during previous employment in its reciprocity policy.
Testing Requirement: Alaska does not require out-of-state teachers to meet its passing scores on content tests.
Additional Requirements: Alaska requires out-of-state teachers to complete three semester hours each in Alaska studies as well as multicultural education or cross-cultural communications, and the state does not offer a test-out option for either of these coursework requirements. In addition, Alaska requires incoming teachers to have earned at least six semester hours of college credit within the five years preceding their application and to have had at least two years of employment.
Background Checks: Alaska requires a full criminal-history background check.
Alaska Administrative Code 4 AAC 12.305(a) Alaska Statute 14.20.015 Initial/Out-of-State Certificate http://www.eed.state.ak.us/TeacherCertification/initial.html#OutOfState
Require evidence of effective teaching when determining eligibility for full certification.
To facilitate the movement of effective teachers between states, Alaska should require that evidence of teacher effectiveness, as determined by an evaluation that includes objective measures of student growth, be considered for all out-of-state candidates.
To uphold standards, require that teachers transferring from other states meet testing requirements.
Although Alaska requires out-of-state teachers to pass its basic skills test, the state should insist that out-of-state teachers meet its own testing requirements or provide evidence of a passing score on an applicable content test from the originating state.
Offer a standard license to certified out-of-state teachers, absent unnecessary requirements.
Alaska should reconsider its recency requirement as a means to judge licensure eligibility. Recent coursework is unlikely to positively affect a teacher's effectiveness, and such a requirement may deter experienced, effective teachers from applying for licensure in the state. Alaska should also consider allowing a test-out option for its state-specific coursework requirements.
Alaska was helpful in providing NCTQ with facts that enhanced this analysis.
6A: Requirements for Out-of-State Teachers
Evidence of effectiveness is far more important than transcript review. In an attempt to ensure that teachers have the appropriate professional and subject-matter knowledge base when granting certification, states often review a teacher's college transcript, no matter how many years earlier a bachelor's degree was earned. A state certification specialist reviews the college transcript, looking for course titles that appear to match state requirements. If the right matches are not found, a teacher may be required to complete additional coursework before receiving standard licensure. This practice holds true even for experienced teachers who are trying to transfer from another state, regardless of their prior success. The application of these often complex state rules results in unnecessary obstacles to hiring talented and experienced teachers. Evaluation systems which prioritize effectiveness and evidence of student learning offer an opportunity to bypass counterproductive efforts like transcript review and get to the heart of the matter: is the out-of-state teacher seeking licensure in a new state an effective teacher?
Testing requirements should be upheld, not waived. While some states have historically imposed burdensome coursework requirements, many have simultaneously failed to impose minimum standards for licensure testing. Instead, some states have offered waivers to veteran teachers transferring from other states, thereby failing to impose minimal standards of professional and subject-matter knowledge. In upholding licensure standards for out-of-state teachers, the state should be flexible in its processes but vigilant in its verification of adequate knowledge. It is all too common for states to develop policies and practices that reverse these priorities, focusing diligently on comparison of transcripts to state documents while demonstrating little oversight of teachers' knowledge. If a state can verify that a teacher has taught successfully and has the required subject-matter and professional knowledge, its only concern should be ensuring that the teacher is familiar with the state's student learning standards.
States licensing out-of-state teachers should not differentiate between experienced teachers prepared in alternate routes and those prepared in traditional programs. It is understandable that states are wary of accepting alternate route teachers from other states, since programs vary widely in quality. However, the same variance in quality can be found in traditional programs. If a teacher comes from another state with a standard license and a clean criminal record, has demonstrated evidence of effectiveness, and can pass the state's licensure tests, whether the preparation was traditional or alternative should be irrelevant.