States
States
Progress on this goal since 2017
- Improved
- Stayed the same
- Regressed
State requires a test of elementary special education candidates’ content knowledge that reports separate scores for each of the four elementary subject areas to earn an elementary special education license.
The state requires a test that reports separate scores for each of the four elementary subject areas. : AL, LA
The state requires a test that reports separate scores for each of the four elementary subject areas, but it permits candidates to earn an overly broad K-12 special education license.: CO, ID
The state requires a test that does not report separate subscores for each of the four subject areas.: AR, IL, MA, NY
The state does not require a test of all candidates.: AK, AZ, CA, CT, DC, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, IN, KS, KY, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, MS, MT, NC, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NM, NV, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY
Footnotes
AR: The Praxis Fundamental Subjects: Content Knowledge (5511) is a general core content test, not an elementary-specific content test, with a composite score.
CA: California requires special education candidates to verify subject matter competence by completing either the multiple subjects or single subject test requirements, or completing a subject matter preparation program. Therefore, content testing is not required.
GA: Only PreK-5 candidates are required to pass the Georgia Assessments for the Certification of Educators (GACE) Special Education General Curriculum/Elementary Education test, which contains two subtests, one of which combines all core content.
IA: In Iowa, candidates have the option of passing the Praxis Fundamental Subjects: Content Knowledge (5511) test which a general test of core content, or the edTPA which is not a content test.
ID: Idaho's use of the Multiple Subjects test is commendable, it is undermined by the state's policy that allows teacher candidates to the option of passing the 7801/7811 Content Knowledge for Teaching test which has four separately scored content tests but does not sufficiently assess candidate’s content knowledge in science.
IL: The Illinois Licensure Testing System (ILTS) Special Education General Curriculum test is not an elementary-specific content test. It's a general content test with a composite score.
KS: Only Kansas's elementary unified candidates are required to pass the Praxis Elementary Education: Content Knowledge for Teaching (7811) test, contains four separately scored subtests in English language arts, mathematics, social studies and science, however the science subtest does not sufficiently assess candidates' content knowledge in science. The state's other high-incidence candidates (K-6 or PreK-12) are not required to pass a content test.
MA: Massachusetts requires a general curriculum test that does not report scores for each elementary subject. A separate score is reported for math.
MS: In Mississippi, only the K-8 supplemental endorsement must be added to an existing elementary license. Candidates will have passed the Praxis Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment (5017) test. This test is not required for K-12 candidates.
NC: North Carolina only requires passage of a math subtest from either the Pearson General Curriculum test or the Praxis Content Knowledge for Teaching test. Additionally, candidates have up to three years to pass the test if they attempt it their first year of teaching.
NJ: New Jersey's K-12 special education license must be added to a general education elementary or secondary license. Therefore there is no guarantee that special education teachers teaching at the elementary level will have passed an elementary content test.A candidate who fails to earn the passing score by 5 percent or less can still meet the subject matter requirement with a GPA of at least 3.5.
NY: New York's elementary content test contains three separately scored subtests.
RI: In Rhode Island, elementary special education teachers must add their certificate to a general elementary education or an all grades certificate. Only teachers in Rhode Island adding their special education certificate to an elementary certification will have passed the elementary content test.
WA: Special education candidates in Washington are required to add their license to a general education endorsement (early childhood, elementary, middle, secondary, K-12 subjects). Therefore, there is no guarantee that candidates will have passed a test at either the elementary or secondary level.
WI: In Wisconsin, content tests are optional for both early childhood and K-12 special education candidates. Neither required test reports separate subscores for each of the four elementary subject areas.
State requires a test of secondary special education candidates’ content knowledge in every subject they are licensed to teach.
The state requires a subject-matter test or separately scored subtest in subject teachers are licensed to teach. :
The state requires a subject-matter test but it does not separately score each subject teachers are licensed to teach, or requires a single subject test, but allows teachers to teach in any core subject area regardless of the test passed.: AR, IL, LA, MA, NY
The state does not require a secondary subject matter test.: AK, AL, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IN, KS, KY, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, MS, MT, NC, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NM, NV, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY
Footnotes
AR: The Praxis Fundamental Subjects: Content Knowledge (5511) is a general core content test, not an secondary-specific content test, with a composite score.
CA: California requires special education candidates to verify subject matter competence by completing either the multiple subjects or single subject test requirements, or completing a subject matter preparation program. Therefore, content testing is not required.
IA: In Iowa, candidates have the option of passing the Praxis Fundamental Subjects: Content Knowledge (5511) test which a general test of core content, or the edTPA which is not a content test.
IL: The Illinois Licensure Testing System (ILTS) Special Education General Curriculum test is not a secondary-specific content test. It's a general content test with a composite score.
LA: State requires a test in at least one subject.
MA: Candidates in Massachusetts applying for the 5-12 special education certificate must pass either the elementary General Curriculum test or a single-subject-matter test at either the 5-8 or 8-12 level.
NJ: New Jersey's K-12 special education license must be added to a general education elementary or secondary license. Therefore there is no guarantee that special education teachers teaching at the secondary level will have passed a secondary content test. A candidate who fails to earn the passing score by 5 percent or less can still meet the subject matter requirement with a GPA of at least 3.5.
NY: New York requires a multi-subject content test specifically geared to secondary special education candidates. It is divided into three subtests.
RI: In Rhode Island, secondary special education teachers must add their certificate to a general elementary education or an all grades certificate. Only teachers in Rhode Island adding their special education certificate to a secondary certification will have passed a secondary content test. Middle grades special education teachers must add to a general education middles grades certificate.
WA: Special education candidates in Washington are required to add their license to a general education endorsement (early childhood, elementary, middle, secondary, K-12 subjects). Therefore, there is no guarantee that candidates will have passed a test at either the elementary or secondary level.
WI: Content tests are optional for both early childhood and K-12 special education candidates.
Updated: February 2020
Select another topic
Teacher Preparation
- Program Entry
- Teacher Shortages and Surpluses
- Program Performance Measures
- Program Reporting Requirements
- Student Teaching/Clinical Practice
Elementary Teacher Preparation
Secondary Teacher Preparation
- Middle School Content Knowledge
- Middle School Licensure Requirements
- Secondary Content Knowledge
- Secondary Licensure Requirements
Special Education Teacher Preparation
Alternate Routes
Teacher Diversity
Hiring
Teacher and Principal Evaluation
Teacher Compensation
Early Childhood Preparation
Retaining Effective Teachers
How we graded
4A: Special Education Content Knowledge
- Elementary Content Knowledge: The state should require that all new high-incidence elementary special education candidates pass a licensure test across all elementary subject areas that is no less rigorous than the test required of general education candidates.
- Secondary Content Knowledge: The state should require that all new high-incidence secondary special education candidates possess adequate content knowledge.
One-half of the total goal score is earned based on the following:
- One-half credit: The state will earn one-half of a point if it requires all new high-incidence elementary special education candidates to pass an elementary content knowledge test that contains four separately scored content exams to ensure appropriate content knowledge in all core academic subject areas.
- One-quarter credit: The state will earn one-quarter of a point if it requires high-incidence special education teachers to pass the same content tests as elementary teachers, but the content test does not contain four separately scored tests.
One-half of the total goal score is earned based on the following:
- One-half credit: The state will earn one-half of a point if it requires all new high-incidence secondary special education candidates to pass a special education licensure test across all secondary subject areas that is no less rigorous than the test required of general education candidates.
- One-quarter credit: The state will earn one-quarter of a point if it requires secondary general education licenses in conjunction with high-incidence special education licenses but does not offer secondary special education licenses.
Research rationale
Generic K-12 special education licenses are inappropriate for teachers of high-incidence special education students. Too many states do not distinguish between elementary and secondary special education teachers, certifying all such teachers under a generic K-12 special education license. While this broad umbrella may be appropriate for teachers of low-incidence special education students, such as those with severe cognitive disabilities, it is deeply problematic for high-incidence special education students, who are expected to learn grade-level content.[1] And because the overwhelming majority of special education students are in the high-incidence category, the result is a fundamentally broken system.
Special education teachers teach content and therefore must know content.[2] While special educators should be valued for their critical role in working with students with disabilities and special needs, each state identifies them not as "special education assistants" but as "special education teachers," presumably because it expects them to provide instruction. Inclusion models, where special education students receive instruction from a general education teacher paired with a special education teacher to provide instructional support, do not mitigate the need for special education teachers to know content.[3] Providing instruction to children who have special needs requires knowledge of both effective learning strategies and the subject matter at hand.[4] Failure to ensure that teachers are well trained in content areas—presumably through subject matter licensing tests—deprives special education students of the opportunity to reach their academic potential.
[1] Levenson, N. (2011). Something has got to change: Rethinking special education (Working Paper 2011-01). American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED521782
[2] For an analysis of the importance of special educator content knowledge, see: Levenson, N. (2011). Something has got to change: Rethinking special education. American Enterprise Institute (Working paper 2011-01, 1-20).; For information on teacher licensing tests, see: Gitomer, D. H., & Latham, A. S. (1999). The academic quality of prospective teachers: The impact of admissions and licensure testing. Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-03-35.pdf; For a study on teacher testing scores and student achievement, see: Ladd, H. F., Clotfelter, C. T., & Vigdor, J. L. (2007). How and why do teacher credentials matter for student achievement (NBER Working Paper, 142786). Retrieved from http://www.caldercenter.org/sites/default/files/1001058_Teacher_Credentials.pdf
[3] Feng, L., & Sass, T. R. (2010). What makes special education teachers special? Teacher training and achievement of students with disabilities (Working Paper 49). National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/1001435-what-makes-special.pdf; Monk, D. H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 125-145.
[4] For research on the importance of teachers' content knowledge, see: Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416-440; Willingham, D. T. (2006). How knowledge helps: It speeds and strengthens comprehension, learning—and thinking. American Educator, 30(1), 30-37.