2015 General Teacher Prep Programs Policy
The state should offer a license with minimal requirements that allows content experts to teach part time.
Minnesota offers a Non-licensed Community Expert license, through which a school district can apply to the Board of Teaching for approval to hire nonlicensed teaching personnel from the community. The district must outline a number of items for the Board of Teaching in this application, including but not limited to the candidate's qualifications, the reasons for needing the candidate, the efforts taken to obtain licensed teachers for the position and the amount of teaching time for which the community expert would be hired. The district must also confirm that the candidate has been given the necessary criminal background checks.
Candidates for this license do not have to pass a subject-matter test.
Minnesota Statutes 122A.25 http://education.state.mn.us/MDE/EdExc/Licen/index.html http://mn.gov/board-of-teaching/images/Special%2520Permissions%2520Overview%25202%252E12%252E13.pdf
Offer a license that allows content experts to serve as part-time
It is unclear whether the Non-licensed Community Expert serves as a vehicle for individuals with deep subject-area knowledge to teach a limited number of courses without fulfilling a complete set of certification requirements. It appears that this may be the intent of the license; however, state policy does not describe the conditions of employment, whether it is for part-time or full-time teaching or requirements that candidates must fulfill.
Require applicants to pass a subject-matter test.
The Non-licensed Community Expert could increase districts' flexibility to staff certain subjects, including many STEM areas, that are frequently hard to staff or may not have high enough enrollment to necessitate a full-time position. The state should require a subject-matter test to ensure expertise in a content area. Only a subject-matter test ensures that teachers on the Non-licensed Community Expert know the specific content they will need to teach.
Minnesota was helpful in providing NCTQ with the facts necessary for this analysis.
can help alleviate severe shortages, especially in STEM subjects.
Some of the subject areas in which states face the greatest teacher shortages are also areas that require the deepest subject-matter expertise. Staffing shortages are further exacerbated because schools or districts may not have high enough enrollments to necessitate full-time positions. Part-time licenses can be a creative mechanism to get content experts to teach a limited number of courses. Of course, a fully licensed teacher is best, but when that isn't an option, a part-time license allows students to benefit from content experts—individuals who are not interested in a full-time teaching position and are thus unlikely to pursue traditional or alternative certification. States should limit requirements for part-time licenses to those that verify subject-matter knowledge and address public safety, such as background checks.
Part-Time Teaching Licenses: Supporting Research
The origin of this goal is the effort to find creative solutions to the STEM crisis. While teaching waivers are not typically used this way, teaching waivers could be used to allow competent professionals from outside of education to be hired as part-time instructors to teach courses such as Advanced Placement chemistry or calculus as long as the instructor demonstrates content knowledge on a rigorous test. See NCTQ, "Tackling the STEM Crisis: Five steps your state can take to improve the quality and quantity of its K-12 math and science teachers", at: http://www.nctq.org/p/docs/nctq_nmsi_stem_initiative.pdf.
For the importance of teachers' general academic ability, see R. Ferguson, "Paying for Public Education: New Evidence on How and Why Money Matters," Harvard Journal on Legislation,Volume 28, Summer 1991, pp. 465-498.
For more on math and science content knowledge, see D. Monk, "Subject Area Preparation of Secondary Mathematics and Science Teachers and Student Achievement," Economics of Education Review, Volume 13, No. 2, June 1994, pp. 125-145; R. Murnane, "Understanding the Sources of Teaching Competence: Choices, Skills, and the Limits of Training," Teachers College Record, Volume 84, No. 3, 1983, pp. 564-569.