Clark County School District, Nevada
|
 |
| Union Status: |
State requires collective bargaining by school districts if a majority of teachers vote for union representation. |
| Union Representation/Affiliation: |
NEA Affiliate |
| Type of Agreement: |
Contract |
| Contract Dates: |
|
| Population Rank: |
5
|
| Population Density: |
Suburban, Large |
| District Enrollment: |
309,051 |
| Teachers Employed: |
16,426.9 |
| Poverty Incidence: |
34% free/reduced lunch |
| Racial Composition |
| 36.1% White |
| 14.2% Black |
| 39.7% Hispanic |
| 9.2% Asian/Pacific Islander |
| 0.8% American Indian/Alaska Native |
|
|
|
|
|
Below are the answers to questions defined in TR3 broken out into various sections. To view the data for the district click the desired section tab.
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
| NEVADA SCOPE OF BARGAINING DATA |
| Legality of Collective Bargaining: |
State requires CB
Citation:
Nevada Revised Statutes: 288.150
"Every local government shall negotiate in good faith ..."
|
| Agency Fees Permitted: |
No
Citation:
Nevada Statutes: 613.130, 613.230, 613.250-613.300
|
| Is Collective Bargaining Addressed in State Law: |
Yes
Citation:
Nevada Revised Statutes: 288.010 -288.280
Local Government Employee Management Relations Act
|
| Can Teachers Strike: |
No
Citation:
Nevada Revised Statutes: 288.230(2)
"The Legislature therefore declares it to be the public policy of the State of Nevada that strikes against the State or any local government employer are illegal."
|
|
|
| Wages: |
Mandatory Subject of Bargaining
Citation:
Nevada Revised Statutes: 288.150(2)(a)
"If either party so requests, agreements reached must be reduced to writing. The scope of mandatory bargaining is limited to (a) salary or wage rates or other forms of direct monetary compensation."
|
| Hours: |
Mandatory Subject of Bargaining
Citation:
Nevada Revised Statutes: 288.150(2)(g)
"If either party so requests, agreements reached must be reduced to writing. The scope of mandatory bargaining is limited to (g) Total hours of work required of an employee on each workday or workweek."
|
| Terms & Conditions of Employment: |
Issue not addressed in state law or administrative code
|
| Grievance Procedures: |
Mandatory Subject of Bargaining
Citation:
Nevada Revised Statutes: 288.150(2)(o)
"If either party so requests, agreements reached must be reduced to writing. The scope of mandatory bargaining is limited to (o) Grievance and arbitration procedures for resolution of disputes relating to interpretation or application of collective bargaining agreements."
|
| Management Rights: |
Prohibited Subject of Bargaining
Citation:
Nevada Revised Statutes: 288.150(3)
"Those subjects matters not within the scope of mandatory bargaining and which are reserved to the local governmental employer without negotiations include...(management rights)"
|
|
|
| Probationary Period (Tenure): |
Issue not addressed in state law or administrative code
|
| Transfer/teacher reassignment: |
Mandatory Subject of Bargaining
Citation:
Nevada Revised Statutes: 288.150(2)(u)
"If either party so requests, agreements reached must be reduced to writing. The scope of mandatory bargaining is limited to (u) The policies for transfer and reassignment of teachers."
|
| Layoff/Reduction in Force: |
Mandatory Subject of Bargaining
Citation:
Nevada Revised Statutes: 288.150(2)(v)
"If either party so requests, agreements reached must be reduced to writing. The scope of mandatory bargaining is limited to (v) Procedures for reductions in force."
|
| Dismissal: |
Mandatory Subject of Bargaining
Citation:
Nevada Revised Statutes: 288.150(2)(i)
"If either party so requests, agreements reached must be reduced to writing. The scope of mandatory bargaining is limited to (i) Discharge or disciplinary procedures."
|
| Evaluation process; instruments: |
Issue not addressed in state law or administrative code
Case Law:
Clark County School District v. LGEMRB, 530 P.2d 114 (Nev. 1974)
Board properly ordered school district to negotiate with LGEMRB, 530 P.2d 114 (Nev. 1974)
Board properly ordered school district to negotiate with teachers' association over daily classroom preparation time, class size, professional improvement, student discipline, school calendar, instructional supplies, teacher performance and load, and differentiated staffing assignments.
|
|
|
| Insurance Benefits: |
Mandatory Subject of Bargaining
Citation:
Nevada Revised Statutes: 288.150(2)(f)
"If either party so requests, agreements reached must be reduced to writing. The scope of mandatory bargaining is limited to (f) Insurance benefits."
|
| Pension/Retirement Benefits: |
Issue not addressed in state law or administrative code
|
| Fringe Benefits: |
Mandatory Subject of Bargaining
Citation:
Nevada Revised Statutes: 288.150(2)(f)
"If either party so requests, agreements reached must be reduced to writing. The scope of mandatory bargaining is limited to (f) Insurance benefits."
|
| Leave: |
Mandatory Subject of Bargaining
Citation:
Nevada Revised Statute: 288.150 (2) The scope of mandatory bargaining is limited to:
(a) Salary or wage rates or other forms of direct monetary compensation.
(b) Sick leave.
(c) Vacation leave.
(d) Holidays.
(e) Other paid or nonpaid leaves of absence....
|
|
|
| Length of the teacher school year: |
Mandatory Subject of Bargaining
Citation:
Nevada Revised Statutes: 288.150(2)(h)
"If either party so requests, agreements reached must be reduced to writing. The scope of mandatory bargaining is limited to (h) Total number of days' work required of an employee in a work year."Case Law:
Clark County School District v. LGEMRB, 530 P.2d 114 (Nev. 1974)
Board properly ordered school district to negotiate with LGEMRB, 530 P.2d 114 (Nev. 1974)
Board properly ordered school district to negotiate with teachers' association over daily classroom preparation time, class size, professional improvement, student discipline, school calendar, instructional supplies, teacher performance and load, and differentiated staffing assignments.
|
| Course content, curriculum, textbook selection: |
Issue not addressed in state law or administrative code
|
| Class load: |
Issue not addressed in state law or administrative code
Case Law:
Clark County School District v. LGEMRB, 530 P.2d 114 (Nev. 1974)
Board properly ordered school district to negotiate with LGEMRB, 530 P.2d 114 (Nev. 1974)
Board properly ordered school district to negotiate with teachers' association over daily classroom preparation time, class size, professional improvement, student discipline, school calendar, instructional supplies, teacher performance and load, and differentiated staffing assignments.
|
| Class size: |
Issue not addressed in state law or administrative code
Case Law:
Clark County School District v. LGEMRB, 530 P.2d 114 (Nev. 1974)
Board properly ordered school district to negotiate with LGEMRB, 530 P.2d 114 (Nev. 1974)
Board properly ordered school district to negotiate with teachers' association over daily classroom preparation time, class size, professional improvement, student discipline, school calendar, instructional supplies, teacher performance and load, and differentiated staffing assignments.
|
| Length of preparation periods: |
Mandatory Subject of Bargaining
Citation:
Nevada Revised Statutes: 288.150(2)(s)
"If either party so requests, agreements reached must be reduced to writing. The scope of mandatory bargaining is limited to (s) Teacher preparation time."Case Law:
Clark County School District v. LGEMRB, 530 P.2d 114 (Nev. 1974)
Board properly ordered school district to negotiate with teachers' association over daily classroom preparation time, class size, professional improvement, student discipline, school calendar, instructional supplies, teacher performance and load, and differentiated staffing assignments.
|
| Number of parent/teacher conferences: |
Issue not addressed in state law or administrative code
|
| Extra curricular duties: |
Issue not addressed in state law or administrative code
|
|
TR3 is the nonpartisan, authoritative source on local school district policy and collective bargaining. TR3 has data from more than 100 school districts and all 50 states. These districts represent 20 percent of public school students in the United States.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Scope of Bargaining Provisions