SIGN UP
 

Findings by State - Kansas

Overview

Scope of Review in Kansas
  1637 New teachers from the state's higher education institutions included in Review (2010)
  18 Institutions evaluated by NCTQ in the 2013 Review
-18 elementary programs, undergraduate (UG) and graduate (G)
-15 secondary programs, undergraduate (UG) and graduate (G)
  6 Institutions with sufficient data for an overall program rating
-Collectively supplying 66% of the state's traditionally trained teachers
-6 elementary programs, undergraduate (UG) and graduate (G)
-5 secondary programs, undergraduate (UG) and graduate (G)
22% Institutions sharing information for the Review
Big "take-aways" about teacher preparation in Kansas:

  • Highly rated programs -- Across the country, NCTQ identified 21 elementary programs (4 percent of those rated) and 84 secondary programs (14 percent) for the Teacher Prep Review Honor Roll, meaning that a program earns at least three out of four possible stars. No Kansas programs are on the Honor Roll.

  • Selectivity in admissions -- The Review found that only 15 percent of elementary and secondary programs in Kansas restrict admissions to the top half of the college-going population, compared to 28 percent nationwide. Countries where students consistently outperform the U.S. typically set an even higher bar, with teacher prep programs recruiting candidates from the top third of the college-going population.

Some worry that increasing admissions requirements will have a negative effect on the diversity of teacher candidates. By increasing the rigor and therefore the prestige of teacher preparation the profession will attract more talent, including talented minorities. This is not an impossible dream: 83 programs across the country earn a Strong Design designation on this standard because they are both selective and diverse, although no such programs were found in Kansas.

  • Early reading instruction -- None of the small sample of evaluated elementary programs in Kansas are preparing teacher candidates in effective, scientifically based reading instruction, an even lower percentage than the small minority of programs (29 percent) providing such training nationally.

  • Elementary math -- A mere 19 percent of evaluated elementary programs nationwide provide strong preparation to teach elementary mathematics, training that mirrors the practices of higher performing nations such as Singapore and South Korea. Just 14 percent of the limited sample of evaluated elementary programs in Kansas provide such training.

  • Student teaching -- Of the evaluated elementary and secondary programs in Kansas, all entirely fail to ensure a high quality student teaching experience, in which candidates are assigned only to highly skilled teachers and receive frequent concrete feedback. 71 percent of programs across the country failed this standard.

  • Classroom management -- 29 percent of the evaluated Kansas elementary and secondary programs earn a perfect four stars for providing feedback to teacher candidates on concrete classroom management strategies to improve classroom behavior, compared to 23 percent of evaluated programs nationwide.

  • Content preparation -- 11 percent of Kansas' elementary programs earn three or four stars for providing teacher candidates adequate content preparation, the same percentage as earned this rating nationwide. The results are better at the high school level, with 33 percent of Kansas secondary programs earning four stars for content preparation, compared to 35 percent nationwide.

  • Outcome data -- All evaluated elementary and secondary programs in Kansas earn at least partial credit for efforts to collect data on their graduates, with 9 percent earning a perfect four stars.

Kansas Elementary Teacher Prep Rating Distribution

Kansas Secondary Teacher Prep Rating Distribution

Programs that earned 3-star rating or more

No 3-star rated programs

Consumer Alert: Programs earning no stars

Endorsers of the Review in Kansas

Kansas Policy Institute

Kansas' Teacher Prep Review was made possible by the following foundations and organizations

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation

Institution List

Institutions with Teacher Training Rated
Baker University Annual new teacher production (2010):  37
Undergraduate Elementary Some standard scores available
Undergraduate Secondary Some standard scores available
Benedictine College Annual new teacher production (2010):  33
Undergraduate Elementary Some standard scores available
Undergraduate Secondary Some standard scores available
Bethany College Annual new teacher production (2010):  26
Undergraduate Elementary Some standard scores available
Undergraduate Secondary Some standard scores available
Emporia State University Annual new teacher production (2010):  271
Undergraduate Elementary
Undergraduate Secondary
Fort Hays State University Annual new teacher production (2010):  81
Undergraduate Elementary
Undergraduate Secondary
Friends University Annual new teacher production (2010):  32
Undergraduate Elementary Some standard scores available
Undergraduate Secondary Some standard scores available
Haskell Indian Nations University Annual new teacher production (2010):  7
Undergraduate Elementary
Kansas State University Annual new teacher production (2010):  306
Undergraduate Elementary
Undergraduate Secondary
MidAmerica Nazarene University Annual new teacher production (2010):  24
Undergraduate Elementary Some standard scores available
Undergraduate Secondary Some standard scores available
Newman University Annual new teacher production (2010):  52
Undergraduate Elementary Some standard scores available
Undergraduate Secondary Some standard scores available
Ottawa University Annual new teacher production (2010):  53
Undergraduate Elementary Some standard scores available
Undergraduate Secondary Some standard scores available
Pittsburg State University Annual new teacher production (2010):  262
Undergraduate Elementary
Undergraduate Secondary
Graduate Secondary
Southwestern College Annual new teacher production (2010):  52
Undergraduate Elementary Some standard scores available
Graduate Secondary Some standard scores available
Sterling College Annual new teacher production (2010):  22
Undergraduate Elementary Some standard scores available
Undergraduate Secondary Some standard scores available
University of Kansas Annual new teacher production (2010):  161
Undergraduate Elementary Some standard scores available
Graduate Special Education Some standard scores available
University of Saint Mary Annual new teacher production (2010):  28
Undergraduate Elementary Some standard scores available
Undergraduate Secondary Some standard scores available
Washburn University Annual new teacher production (2010):  30
Undergraduate Elementary Some standard scores available
Wichita State University Annual new teacher production (2010):  160
Undergraduate Elementary

Institutions with Teacher Training Not Rated

Bethel College
Central Christian College of Kansas
Kansas Wesleyan University
McPherson College
Tabor College

State Context

Good preparation does not guarantee that teachers will ultimately be effective, but there is much that states can do to ensure that new teachers are classroom ready. The tables below are drawn from NCTQ's 2013 State Teacher Policy Yearbook (Full State Report here) and offer a summary of Kansas's teacher preparation policies, identifying strong policies and those in need of improvement.

Each state has a set of laws, rules and regulations that govern how teachers are prepared for the classroom.  These policies establish guidelines for admission to teacher preparation programs, set standards for what teachers should know and be able to do in order to be licensed, and can be used to hold preparation programs accountable for the quality of teachers they produce.

Although states regulate most aspects of how teachers are prepared, where in each state this authority lies is not standard across the country. And in some states, authority for different components of teacher preparation rests with different entities.