NCTQ

 
 

Rationale: High school preparation

For decades, teacher preparation and higher education reformers have been attempting to improve the rigor of undergraduate teacher preparation programs by promoting the requirement of full academic majors for prospective teachers. For example, the Holmes Group of the mid-1980s, a group of education school deans, advocated for teachers capping the solid preparation represented by an academic major with professional preparation.

A full academic major should not be a difficult proposition for the preparation of secondary teachers. Candidates for secondary certification at the master's degree level earn full academic majors before they enter education programs, as do most certification candidates in five-year teacher preparation programs. Moreover, the definition of a "highly qualified teacher" under the federal No Child Left Behind statute requires that all secondary teachers either major in the subject they teach or pass a rigorous test in that subject.

NCTQ has long endorsed an academic major for all secondary teachers. While there is little or no research on subject areas such as English or the social sciences that provides confirmation of any connection between subject matter preparation and instructional efficacy, there is direct research indicating that sufficient coursework preparation in mathematics and science makes high school teachers more effective.1

1Chaney, B. (1995). Student outcomes and the professional preparation of 8th grade teachers. NSF/NELS: 88 Teacher transcript analysis. Rockville, MD: Westat; Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. (1996). Why don't schools and teachers seem to matter? Assessing the impact of unobservables on educational productivity. Journal of Human Resources, 32, 503-23 ERIC: ED400237; Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. (October 1998). Why should we reward degrees for teachers? Phi Delta Kappan, 134-138; Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 129-145; Monk, D. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 12(2):125- 145; Rothman, A., (1969). Teacher characteristics and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6(4), 340-348; Rowan, B., Chiang, F., & Miller, R.J. (October 1997). Using research on employees' performance to study the effects of teachers on students' achievement. Sociology of Education, 70, 256-284; Wenglinsky, H. (2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/PICTEAMAT.pdf