Skip to Content
  • Unions & Contracts
  • April 2014: Teacher excessing and placement

    April 28, 2014

    District Trendline, previously known as Teacher Trendline, provides actionable research to improve district personnel policies that will strengthen the teacher workforce. Want evidence-based guidance on policies and practices that will enhance your ability to recruit, develop, and retain great teachers delivered right to your inbox each month? Subscribe here.

    April 2014: Teacher excessing and placement

    In this month’s Trendline, we examine what factors
    determine how teachers are excessed and how excessed teachers are placed in
    schools.

    Teacher
    excessing

    Excessing teachers occurs when a school has to cut staff due
    to any number of issues including, but not limited to, a drop in student
    enrollment, budgetary cuts or programmatic changes. Excessed teachers are not
    necessarily out of a job, but they do have to leave their current position and
    find another one within the district, usually in another school. Traditionally,
    districts have used seniority to determine how teachers are excessed, ensuring
    teachers with the least seniority are moved first.

    While there has been some change in how districts identify
    teachers for excessing since we covered
    this topic last year
    , it is clear that seniority still dominates this
    identification process. Out of the 114 districts and 2 charter management
    organizations in our Teacher
    Contract Database
    , 63 percent use
    seniority as the primary factor when deciding which teachers should be excessed,
    compared to 11 percent that consider performance
    .

    Notably, the districts that consider performance when
    identifying teachers for excessing last year have not changed their minds.
    These five districtsCypress-Fairbanks (TX),
    Denver, Douglas County (CO),
    Louisiana Recovery School District and Orleans Parish
    do not consider seniority in teacher excessing and prioritize performance
    during the excessing process.

    Placement
    after excessing

    When
    teachers are excessed, they are still employees of the school district and, in
    most cases, are entitled by virtue of their contract to a new placement in
    another school within the district. These placement decisions are made at
    different administrative levels depending on the district, and they usually factor
    in seniority to varying degrees.

    In
    a quarter of the districts in our Database, principals or a site selection
    committee choose which excessed teachers are placed at their schools.
    In
    33 districts, the HR department assigns excessed teachers to vacant positions. Four districts – Clark County (NV),
    Jefferson County (CO), Little Rock and Spokane 
    give excessed teachers the unusual right to choose their placement
    based on their seniority, without input or approval from the principal. In
    those four districts, if you’re the most senior teacher looking for a position,
    you get to pick first from the list of vacancies.

    Excessed
    teachers who cannot find placements

    In the few districts that refuse to ‘force place’ teachers
    into vacancies (giving principals the right to refuse a teacher), there are
    times when teachers cannot find placements after being excessed. Over a third of the districts in our Database either place these
    teachers in vacancies (either with principal input or without) as they arise after
    the regular hiring rounds or in temporary assignments until the teachers find permanent
    positions.
    In eight districts, the contracts clearly state that these teachers will
    eventually be exited from the system, either by being laid off or placed on
    unpaid leave.

    In Charlotte-Mecklenburg,
    the district contract does not specify how long excessed teachers have to find
    placement before they leave the district. In Clark
    County (NV)
    , Little Rock,
    Manchester, Palm Beach County
    and Spokane, teachers reserve recall
    rights for up to two years, during which they are offered positions as they
    become available based on their seniority. In Chicago, teachers are placed in a
    “reassigned teacher pool” for up to 10 months, after which if they have not
    secured a permanent position, they may be laid off. In Douglas
    County (CO)
    , these teachers are reassigned by the district for up to
    one year, after which they are placed on unpaid leave and on a priority list
    for hiring for up to two years.

    The District of Columbia also
    gives teachers a maximum of one year to secure permanent placement. Unlike other districts though, DC also offers these teachers a buy-out or early
    retirement.
    Specifically, DC offers excessed teachers:

    • A $25,000 buyout,
    • Early retirement,
      or
    • A year-long temporary assignment and continue
      looking for a position.  If they cannot find another position within that
      year they will be laid off.

    Why
    does this all matter?

    If districts do not ensure clear, fair dismissal options for
    low-performing teachers, excessing often becomes a workaround solution for
    principals who want to move low-performing teachers out of their schools. The
    adverse effects of this are compounded when these particular teachers are
    placed in vacancies in lower-performing schools, where the most vacancies
    usually exist within a district.

    As
    districts continue to develop, implement and refine performance-based teacher
    evaluation systems, we will keep track of how districts
    use that information to drive various personnel decisions, including placements
    for excessed teachers.